http://albertpeia.com/humanplagueonearth.htm
{ It really doesn’t matter what they believe; but rather, it’s
what is, that counts. Anyone with average intelligence or better, if they’ve
been paying attention, ineluctably must conclude that humans are a ‘net
negative’ in real terms. That will never change! Human beings are, on balance,
inherently destructive. Fortunately, universally, there is no significant
impact inasmuch as the human plague is confined to this solar system; and, for
all intents and purposes, to this dying planet. Remember, there’s just decades
left at best! }
‘There
is a clear consensus among the global elite that overpopulation is the primary
cause of the most important problems that the world is facing and that
something desperately needs to be done about it. They truly believe that
humans are a plague upon the earth and that we will literally destroy the
planet if we are left to our own devices. To the elite, everything from
global warming to our growing economic problems can be directly traced back to
the lack of population control. They warn that if nothing is done about
the exploding population, we will be facing a future full of poverty, war and
suffering on a filthy, desolate planet. They complain that it "costs
too much" to keep elderly patients that are terminally ill alive, and they
eagerly promote abortion for babies that are "not wanted" because
they would be "too much of a burden" on society. Anything that
reduces the human population in any way is a good thing for those that believe
in this philosophy. This twisted philosophy is being promoted in our
movies, in our television shows, in our music, in countless books, on many of
the most prominent websites in the world, and it is being taught at nearly all
of the most important colleges and universities on the planet. The people
promoting this philosophy have very, very deep pockets, and they are actually
convinced that they are helping to "save the world" by trying to
reduce the size of the human population. In fact, many of them are
entirely convinced that we are in a "life or death" struggle for the
fate of the planet, and that if humanity does not willingly choose to embrace
population control soon, then a solution will have to be "forced"
upon them.
Yes,
I know that all of this may sound like something out of a science fiction
novel. But there are a whole lot of people out there that are absolutely
obsessed with this stuff, and many of them are in very prominent positions
around the globe.
The
following are 30 population control quotes which show that the elite truly
believe that humans are a plague upon the earth and that a great culling is
necessary...
1. UK
Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: "We are a plague on the
Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just
climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde.
Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us,
and the natural world is doing it for us right now"
2. Paul
Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the
author of "The Population Bomb": "To our minds, the fundamental
cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the
population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth
is obvious but too much neglected or denied"
3. Paul
Ehrlich again, this time on the size of families: "Nobody, in my view,
has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is
twins"
4. Dave
Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: "We humans have become a
disease, the Humanpox."
5. CNN
Founder Ted Turner: "A total world population of 250-300 million
people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
6. Japan’s
Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious
illnesses: "You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the
government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die."
7. David
Rockefeller: "The negative impact of population growth on all of our
planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident."
8. Environmental
activist Roger Martin: "On a finite planet, the optimum population
providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the
maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer
people mean better lives."
9. HBO
personality Bill Maher: "I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m
for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m
for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote
death."
10. MIT
professor Penny Chisholm: "The real trick is, in terms of trying
to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates
in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine
the level at which humans will level off on earth."
11. Julia
Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: "The only known solution to
ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s
decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and
eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success
in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate
change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity
loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides,
reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to
2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error,
but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The
speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological
programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date."
12. Colorado
State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate
Ethics and Population Policy”: "Ending human population growth is almost
certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing
catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current
human numbers may be necessary in order to do so."
13. Professor
of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka:
"I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that
the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so
many of us."
14. Detroit
News Columnist Nolan Finley: "Since the national attention is on birth
control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and
bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for
fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.
We’ve
got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents
who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women
who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread
their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences."
15. John
Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London:
"The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of
magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching
off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet."
16. Democrat
strategist Steven Rattner: "WE need death panels. Well, maybe not
death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources
more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare
will swamp the federal budget."
17. Matthew
Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article
entitled "The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart": "But not
only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal
budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people
surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the
American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple
fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in
terms of life expectancy or quality of life."
18. Planned
Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: "All of our problems are the
result of overbreeding among the working class"
19. U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: "Frankly I had thought that
at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and
particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many
of."
20. Planned
Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: "The most merciful thing that the
large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
21. Salon
columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled "So What If
Abortion Ends Life?": "All life is not equal. That’s a difficult
thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like
death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers.
Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in
whose body it resides."
22. Alberto
Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of
the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical
Ethics: "[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have
justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. …
[W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than
‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is
comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.
Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in
all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases
where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but
the well-being of the family is at risk."
23. Nina
Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: "We need to continue to
decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can't support
many more people."
24.
Barack Obama's primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: "A program of
sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively
greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to
implement than trying to sterilize men.
The
development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under
the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities
for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and
might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of
births."
25. David
Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: "Childbearing
[should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a
government license ... All potential parents [should be] required to use
contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen
for childbearing."
26. Thomas
Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population
Affairs: "There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce
population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean
methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in
Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of
control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce
it…"
27. Mikhail
Gorbachev: "We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception,
about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological
crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there
aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."
28. Jacques
Costeau: "In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate
350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad
not to say it."
29.
Finnish environmentalist Pentti
Linkola: "If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice
myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die"
30. Prince
Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife
Fund: "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a
deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
There
is so much more that could be said about all of this.
If
you would like to learn more, the following are 10 of my previous articles
about the population control agenda of the global elite...
#1
"The Population Control Agenda Of The Radical Humanists Who Would
Love For You And I To Die"
#2
"They
Love Death"
#3
"From
7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of
The Global Elite"
#4
"Al
Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control"
#5
"The
Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible"
#8
"Hillary
Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign
Policy"
#9
"New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight
Climate Change"
So
what do you think about all of this?
Do
you agree or disagree with the sick population control agenda of the global
elite?
-----
http://albertpeia.com/dominationcontrolgrid.htm
{ First and foremost clarification: There are no elite
on this planet. The grim reality for this planet is a dominant species
descended from initially notochords, primitive chordates, and relatively more
recently, primitive apes.
See generally, http://albertpeia.com/anthroindex1.htm , for a brief but sorrowful history of
man. }
http://albertpeia.com/allfornaught.htm
[ And such would be all for naught, in any event. CNN: Your Behavior
Will Be Controlled by a Brain Chip Paul Joseph Watson | Smart phone will be implanted within 75 years. { 75 years? This world ain’t got 75
years … decades at best! For those ‘glass-half-full-reality-be-damned’ types,
the bright side is that there will still be that desolate ‘third rock from the
sun’; which, like ‘old man river’, will just keep rollin’ along (around the
sun). } ]