The
Elite Believe That You Are Ruining Their Planet And
They Want You To Stop Reproducing
http://endoftheamericandream.com
http://albertpeia.com/planetalreadyruined.htm
{ First and
foremost clarification: There are no elite on this planet. The grim reality for this planet
is a dominant species descended from initially notochords, primitive chordates,
and relatively more recently primitive apes }
Today, there are more than
7 billion people living on earth. For the global elite, that is problem
number one. The vast majority of us don't spend much time thinking about
global population issues, but for many among the elite it is an absolute
obsession. Many of them truly believe that you are ruining their planet and they
desperately want you to stop reproducing so much. Among the elite, the
belief that the world is grossly overpopulated and that this is causing most of
our major global problems crosses all political, cultural and social
boundaries. This philosophy is taught as gospel at the vast majority of
all colleges and universities on the planet, and it is being relentlessly
pushed by the United Nations, the WHO, the World Bank and national governments
all over the globe. When most people think of "overpopulation",
they think of places such as
Right now, most of us living in the
western world are not prepared to accept "forced" population control
measures and the global elite know this. But the truth is that they absolutely
love what is going on right now in places such as
In
When
Ji Yeqing awakened, she was
already in the recovery room.
Chinese
authorities had dragged her out of her home and down four flights of stairs, she
said, restraining and beating her husband as he tried to come to her aid.
They
whisked her into a clinic, held her down on a bed and forced her to undergo an
abortion.
Her offense?
Becoming pregnant with a second child, in violation of
So does the international community
condemn
No, in fact the United Nations gives
In the western world, there are also
great efforts underway to reduce family sizes and to get women to choose not to
have children. But these efforts are always "voluntary".
We are told that if women are "empowered" that they will always
choose to have fewer children.
But many radical environmentalists
are openly complaining that these voluntary methods are not getting the job
done fast enough.
For example, the following is from a
recent article by Julia Whitty for Mother Jones....
The
only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population
growth faster than it's decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same
time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet's
resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global
issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health
care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we've already made
unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children
per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes
brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her
individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard
against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat
to date.
But
it's not enough. And it's still not fast enough. Faced with a world that can
support either a lot of us consuming a lot less or far fewer of us consuming
more, we're deadlocked: individuals, governments, the media, scientists,
environmentalists, economists, human rights workers, liberals, conservatives,
business and religious leaders.
For radicals such as Whitty, things are never moving fast enough. They
truly believe that humanity is destroying the planet and that they are
literally attempting to "save the world" by pushing for global
population control.
But this kind of thinking is not just
reflected in the writings of a few radicals.
The truth is that "scientific
reports" advocating global population control are regularly featured in
the most important newspapers all over the planet.
The following example comes from a
recent article in the Guardian....
World
population needs to be stabilised quickly and high
consumption in rich countries rapidly reduced to avoid "a downward spiral
of economic and environmental ills", warns a major report from the Royal
Society.
Contraception
must be offered to all women who want it and consumption cut to reduce
inequality, says the study published on Thursday, which was chaired by Nobel
prize-winning biologist Sir John Sulston.
The
assessment of humanity's prospects in the next 100 years, which has taken 21
months to complete, argues strongly that to achieve long and healthy lives for
all 9 billion people expected to be living in 2050, the twin issues of
population and consumption must be pushed to the top of political and economic
agendas.
When was the last time that you saw
an article that was 100% opposed to global population control featured in an
important newspaper?
Sadly, this population control agenda
has a complete stranglehold on the scientific community. The philosophy
that the earth is massively overpopulated and that this overpopulation is
causing most of our biggest problems is considered to be gospel at most of our
colleges and universities today.
If you question this orthodoxy, you
risk being academically blackballed.
Not only that, but the scientific
community considers the biggest offenders of all to be Americans because of our
"excessive" lifestyles.
For example, just check out what statistician
Paul Murtaugh of Oregon State University said a
while back....
"Using
United Nations projections of fertility, and projecting statistically through
the lifespan of the mother's line—some lineages being short-lived, others
indefinitely long—an American child born today adds an average 10,407 tons of
carbon dioxide to the carbon legacy of her mother. That's almost six times more
CO2 than the mother's own lifetime emissions. Furthermore, the
ecological costs of that child and her children far outweigh even the combined
energy-saving choices from all a mother's other good decisions, like buying a
fuel-efficient car, recycling, using energy-saving appliances and lightbulbs. The carbon legacy of one American child and her
offspring is 20 times greater than all those other sustainable maternal choices
combined."
Murtaugh also believes that a child born in the
This helps to explain why the elite
are so obsessed with abortion and "family planning".
The elite are desperate to convince
you to stop reproducing.
They truly believe that they are
helping to "save the world" when they convince us to have less children.
In fact, the amount of money that is
being spent to promote "family planning" around the globe is
absolutely staggering.
For example, according to a recent MarketWatch
article Bill and Melinda Gates plan to spend 4 billion dollars to get
contraceptive devices into the hands of 120 million more women by the year
2020....
Melinda
Gates recently announced a “new crusade” for her $32 billion Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation. A recent Newsweek interview with Michelle Goldberg says it’s
a “decision that is likely to change lives all over the planet.”
Gates
has “decided to make family planning her signature issue,” by investing “billions
to revolutionize contraception worldwide,” with substantial economic
consequences.
The
Gates decision will “be hugely significant for American women.” She’s “pouring
money into the long-neglected field of contraceptive research, seeking entirely
new methods of birth control,” a “whole new class of drugs,” some that could
even work without hormones, and others, might be implantable devises that never
need to be removed, can even be turned on and off by the woman.
While Bill and Melinda Gates portray
their population control efforts as "humanitarian endeavors", others
among the global elite are more open about what they consider the
"endgame" to be.
The following examples are from a
recent article by Paul Joseph Watson....
-
Finnish
environmentalist guru Pentti Linkola,
publicly called for climate change deniers be “re-educated” in eco-gulags and
that the vast majority of humans be killed with the rest enslaved and controlled
by a green police state, with people forcibly sterilized, cars confiscated and
travel restricted to members of the elite.
-
Another Finnish
environmentalist writer, Martin Kreiggeist, hails
Linkola’s call for eco-gulags and oppression as “a
solution,” calling for people to “take up the axes” in pursuit of killing off
the third world. Kreiggeist wants fellow eco-fascists
to “act on” Linkola’s call for mass murder in order
to solve overpopulation.
-
In 2010, James Lovelock, the creator of the Gaia hypothesis, told the Guardian that “democracy
must be put on hold” to combat global warming and that “a few people with
authority” should be allowed to run the planet because people were too stupid
to be allowed to steer their own destinies.
There are a surprising number of
people out there that actually advocate for mass murder and mass enslavement
for the good of the planet.
Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth
First, once stated that reducing the global population to 100 million people is one of his three main goals....
"My
three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million
worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the
world."
Sadly, this philosophy has even
infected the
Of
the billions of taxpayer dollars that the
If you have not read the rest of that
article yet, you really should. You can find the rest of that article right here.
At this point, nearly every major
international organization is involved in these population control efforts to at
least some degree.
For example, a recent article by Jurriaan
Maessen detailed how the World Bank is actually
using "financial assistance" as leverage to get developing nations to
conform to the global population control agenda....
According
to two subsequent documents put out by the World Bank, its guidelines dictate
that in order to qualify for World Bank lending, sovereign nations must
implement population reduction objectives as outlined by the World Bank and UN
Population Fund. If they refuse, lending will be withdrawn.
Already
pre-tested and implemented in Yemen and Niger, these guidelines are destined
for global implementation within the next decade, says the World Bank.
Isn't that sick?
Later in that same article, Maessen discusses how the UN, the WHO, the World Bank and
many other international organizations all work together to move this twisted
agenda forward....
Returning
to the essence, the intention and the strategy leave little for the
imagination: a global consensus is in place between all the major transnational
institutions and banks: the earth’s population must be brought down, with all
means necessary. The World Bank uses financial tools to bring nations on their
knees, demanding they cull their numbers; the UN guarantees the political
legitimizing for these depopulation policies (Agenda 21); the Foundations
develop the anti-fertility vaccines and GM Food, the World Health Organization
takes care of the “health-standards” and distribution. With the help of this
global construct, carefully coordinated from the top-down, the scientific
dictatorship has circled the wagons around all of free humanity.
Sadly, there is so much more that
could be said about all of this. If you are interested in learning more
about the disgusting population control agenda of the global elite, the
following are 10 more articles I would recommend checking out....
#1 "They Love Death" http://albertpeia.com/theylovedeath.htm
#2 "From
7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick
Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite"
#3 "Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control"
#4 "The
Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As
Possible"
#7 "One Less Child?
#8 "Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The
Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy"
#9 "New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight
Climate Change"
This
population control agenda is not going away any time soon.
Ultimately,
this philosophy will lead us down a path that will end in absolute global
tyranny.
