By Toby
Harnden
PUBLISHED:| UPDATED:
‘A new biography of Barack Obama has established that his
grandfather was not, as is related in the President’s own memoir, detained by
the British in Kenya and found that claims that he was tortured were a
fabrication.
'Barack Obama: The Story' by David Maraniss
catalogues dozens of instances in which Obama deviated significantly from the
truth in his book 'Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance'. The
641-page book punctures the carefully-crafted narrative of Obama’s life.
One of the enduring myths of Obama’s ancestry is that his
paternal grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama, who
served as a cook in the British Army, was imprisoned in 1949 by the British for
helping the anti-colonial Mau Mau rebels and held for
several months.
Obama’s step-grandmother Sarah, Onyango
wife, who is still living, is quoted in the future President’s memoir, as
saying: ‘One day, the white man’s askaris came to
take Onyango away, and he was placed in a detention
camp.
‘But he had been in the camp for over six months,
and when he returned to Alego he was very thin and
dirty. He had difficulty walking, and his head was full of lice. He was so
ashamed, he refused to enter his house or tell us what happened.’
In a 2008 interview, Sarah Obama claimed that he was
‘whipped every morning and evening’ by the British. ‘They would sometimes
squeeze his testicles with metal rods. They also pierced his nails and buttocks
with a sharp pin, with his hands and legs tied together. He was lucky to
survive. Some of his fellow inmates were mutilated with castration pliers and
beaten to death with clubs.’
But Maraniss, who researched
Obama’s life in Kenya, Indonesia, Hawaii and the mainland United States, found
that there were ‘no remaining records of any detention, imprisonment, or trial
of Hussein Onyango Obama’. He interviewed five people
who knew Obama’s grandfather, who died in 1979, who ‘doubted the story or were
certain it did not happen’.
This undermines the received wisdom that Obama’s grandfather
was a victim of oppression, an assumption that has in turn fuelled theories
that Obama harbours an animus towards
John Ndalo Aguk,
who worked with Onyango before the alleged
imprisonment and was in touch with him weekly afterwards said he 'knew nothing'
about any detention and would have noticed if he had gone missing for several
months.
Zablon Okatch, who worked with Onyango
as a servant to American diplomats after the supposed incarceration, said:
‘Hussein was never jailed. I know that for a fact. It would have been difficult
for him to get a job with a white family, let alone a diplomat, if he once
served in jail.’
Charles Oluoch, whose father was
adopted by Onyango, said that ‘he did not have any
trouble with the government in any way'.
Dick Opar, a relative by marriage
to Onyango and a senior Kenyan police official, gave
what Maraniss judged to be the most authoritative
word. ‘People make up stories,’ he said. ‘If you get arrested, you say it was
the fight for independence, but they are arrested for another thing.
‘I would have known. I would have known. If he was in Kamiti Prison for only a day, even if for a day, I would
have known.’
Maraniss also casts a sceptical eye on Obama’s
grandmother’s tales of racism in Kansas, doubting whether she was ever
chastised for addressing a black janitor as ‘Mister’ or ridiculed for playing
with a black girl.
Obama himself, Maraniss finds,
deliberately distorted elements of his own life to fit into a racial narrative.
The author writes that Obama presents himself in his memoir as ‘blacker and
more disaffected’ than he really was.
The memoir ‘accentuates characters drawn from black
acquaintances who played lesser roles his real life but could be used to
advance a line of thought, while leaving out or distorting the actions of
friends who happened to be white’.
In the forward to his memoir, Obama wrote that ‘for the sake
of compression, some of the characters that appear are composites of people
I’ve known, and some events appear out of precise chronology’.
But Maraniss writes that Obama’s
book is ‘literature and memoir, not history and autobiography’ and concludes:
‘The character creations and rearrangements of the book are not merely a matter
of style, devices of compression, but are also substantive.’
Writing about his schooldays, Obama created a friend called
Maraniss found, however, that Regina was based on Caroline Boss, a white student
leader at
The book also notes that Obama removed two white roommates
in
A tale of the father of Obama’s Indonesian stepfather Soewarno Martodihardjo being
killed by Dutch soldiers as he fought for Indonesian independence turns out to
be ‘a concocted myth in almost all respects’, Maraniss
finds.
According to the book, both Obama’s father and his paternal
grandfather were abusive towards women and Maraniss
finds that Obama’s story that he was abandoned by his father when he was two
was false – in fact, Obama’s mother fled to Washington state a year earlier,
possibly because she was being beaten.
A character in Obama’s memoir called Ray, portrayed as a
symbol of young blackness, is in fact based on a fellow pupil who was half
Japanese, part native American and part black and was
not a close friend.
‘In the memoir Barry and Ray, could be heard complaining
about how rich white haole [upper class white
Hawaiian] girls would never date them. In fact, neither had
much trouble in that regard.’
Obama notes of his own grandfather that he was apt to create
‘history to conform with the image he wished for
himself’.
Maraniss, who also wrote an acclaimed biography of Bill Clinton, suggests that
throughout his life Obama himself, following on from his forbears on both
sides, has done the same thing.’