St. Marks 5th St. Part A CA LTD Part
1317 E. 7th St.
Los Angeles, CA 90021
At the risk of appearing sarcastic (I’m not trying to be so), at the outset let me emphasize that I realize that the subject premises is not
The Waldorf Astoria, which of course is reflected in the price. However, I am constrained to point out that which follows in light of what is clearly an egregious waste of taxpayer funds and resources, particularly in light of rules/laws applicable to any rental dwelling,
especially where public funds are involved.
I have annexed hereto in pertinent part the House Rules which are quite
regularly and somewhat brazenly violated. Also appended is a copy of the police report concerning the assault/robbery of me by 4 blacks and
2 hispanics some blocks away from the building to put the “atmosphere”
of the building in proper perspective. Finally, I have attached a copy of the note that was stuck on my door by the “person” involved in the most recent incident following a similar incident earlier this week (room #409).
I neither use drugs (illegal or legal) nor alcohol (but would not be disinclined to a social drink which I have chosen for quite some time-
years-not to engage in). I do smoke tobacco which for whatever reason
(given the death, carnage, crime, corruption, etc. attendant to alcohol
and illegal drugs) has been the object of California’s substantial attention despite the pervasiveness of and the state’s blasé attitude
toward illegal drugs [I have seen los angelians shooting up (main-lining, probably heroin) on the streets (San Julian) in broad daylight,
“curbside”, and unobstructed, as well as smoking crack]. Parenthetically, I ask any California “policymaker” to tell me the last time they had heard of someone robbing another or committing other crime to get money for a pack of cigarettes which admittedly are not healthy but do not impair ones mental acuity.
One cannot walk down 5th St. in close proximity to the building without being “hawked” to buy drugs, quite brazenly with their “lookouts” calling out the absence (clear) or presence of police [if it can be imagined, as bad as the scenario is now, the situation is improved
since the time I had been robbed (I was first asked to buy drugs by a
negroe, then assaulted and robbed by same and others) and the subsequent police crackdown]. Buying, selling, and using drugs, “morning, noon, and night” is all they do. In what appears to be an attempt to intimidate the police, there are the so-called “cries of
racial profiling”. I have yet to see even one statistic concerning the
ethnicity of those committing the crimes. When I reviewed the mug shots concerning the assault and robbery, the same “was like perusing the Harlem High School yearbook”. Indeed, they were almost all negroes; not because they were “singled out”, but as I have directly observed, have
been the ones committing the crimes. Indeed, these are not “closet pacifists, peace-corps members, or respecters of the law”, but rather brutal criminals, gang members, etc., who should be in prisons. The welfare funds paid to these people is almost invariably spent within
day(s) of receipt (if not before by way of the prevalent drug dealer/loan sharks) on illegal drugs. The false, diversionary “cries
racism” do not ring true. [Indeed, at a time when slavery was globally accepted, negroes sold other (vanguished by negroes) negroes, into slavery. I also think it noteworthy that negroes and apes (gorillas, chimpanzees, oranguatangs, etc.) are indigenous to the same sub-saharan
African regions and share an uncivilized behavior and look]. Wherever the negroes are in numbers, ie., inner-cities, sub-saharan Africa, etc., the inherent uncivilized behavior of and cost to civilized society thereby is substantial, and should be paid back by said uncivilized people whose cost to more civilized societies has been enormous. It is time to recognize that the public monies would be better spent on more prisons which would take these criminals off the streets rather than the enormous wasted expenditures of money, time, resources, energy, personnel, etc., not to mention the costs of the crimes themselves. These problems are inherent and will not change. It is that unfortunate time in America’s history that reality be confronted without regard to the “pandered to, politically correct, block vote”.
There have been some evenings, though not regular, that one can smell marihuana on the 4th floor where I am presently staying (violative of House Rules, ¶ 9, and the law). Moreover, the playing of exceedingly loud “music” (violative of House Rules, ¶ 15) substantially after 10 p.m. is a regular occurrence. While I have earplugs (3 pairs), the excessive noise in said late hours renders same inadequate. The most recent incident [a previous egregious “noise incident” involved the negroe in room 402 – adjacent to me in #404 – on 5-27-02; he and 3-4
other negroes were up literally all night, playing loud music, and
“partying” (you know, “fun-loving-negroes”)(crack is a stimulant and quite obviously I couldn’t confirm same). I had 2 cummulative final exams at LACC in my program on 5-28-02. I dozed for at most 35 – 45
minutes; but fortunately my prior mastery of the material enabled me to overcome the detriment of the sleep deficit](protestations to these negroes fall on deaf ears), involved the tenant in room # . Earlier in the week, in or around July 24th – 25th, at or around 3 a.m. in the morning, I did protest the exceedingly loud noise, which protestations were ignored by said negroe. Finally, management arrived and the “music/noise” ended for the evening. On the night of 7-27-02, early morning 7-28-02, despite the continued loud playing of “music” by
said occupant, being overly indulgent and patient with same until around 3:30 – 4:00 a.m., (there were several people in and out of said room, carrying on noisily in addition to the “music”) when I vehemently protested the same. Amazingly (but I do believe this to have been a “contrived incident”), the negroe came and knocked on my door to complain about my protestations, to which I responded that I would not speak with her but would contact the landlord. She persisted in knocking on the door as before to which I stated that her continued action was becoming harassment. Finally, the desk person knocked with her standing with him to which I refused further discussion, indicating rather my present course.
I do not consider myself a racist but rather objective and honest. In light of the objective facts and circumstances, and all things including reality considered, if one persists in the erroneous notion that from the above or otherwise that I am a racist, then I will indeed accept said moniker as a badge of pride and honor. The tenant in #409
should cease and desist from her disruptive, uncivilized behavior.*
Thanking you for your anticipated attention to this matter, I am
Albert L. Peia
611 E. 5th St., #404
Los Angeles, Ca. 90013
*Please note that on August 1, 2002, I’m sure with full awareness of the incident set forth above and to contrive a similar incident, at 12:45 a.m. the negroe in #402, (problem as set forth above among other
loud noise/”music” incidents not referenced hereinabove), did persist
in the “playing of loud noise/’music’” over my protestation. To borrow from a long standing principle of law/definition promulgated by the U.S. Supreme Court and applying same herein, negroes collectively, individually, and “culturally” (actually “the absence of meaningful culture”), are obscene; that is, utterly without redeeming social value. The same persisted until approximately 2:30 a.m.. The negroe in #402 should also cease and desist from his disruptive, uncivilized behavior.
*In the morning of August 2, 2002, beginning at or around 12:07 a.m.
(in what I reasonably infer to be a contrived incident, in light of
the “familiar” voices of (“familiar”) negroes in the background as well), a fairly regular (coinciding usually with the “welfare money dispensation week”, ie., 1st thru 10th) incident(s) concerning the loud playing of hispanic music coupled with loud drunken or drug induced outbursts, also consistent with mental illness, occurred and continued over my protestation. Said hispanic should also cease and desist from his disruptive, uncivilized behavior.
*On August 12, 2002, over my protestations, the uncivilized negroe in #402 continued the loud playing of negroe noise/”music”, contrary to “house rules”; it is now past 11:13 p.m. (the post welfare distribution week is usually a desperate, unruly time as now for the crack-addicted negroes, hispanics,etc., monies having been dissipated on same by then. Said typically uncivilized negroe in #402 should cease and desist from his disruptive, uncivilized behavior contrary to “house rules” and law.
It is now past 1:00 a.m., August 13, 2002, and the uncivilized negroe in #402 is (purposefully, to contrive an incident) continuing to loudly play the negroe “noise”, over my protestation. I insist upon some action with regard to the actions of this uncivilized negroe.
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
C. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles