March , 2003
Roseann
B. Mackechnie, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd
Circuit
United States Court House
40 Foley Square
New York, N.Y. 10007
Re: Plaintiff/Appellant’s Request for
Permission to Waive
6 Minute
Oral Argument
Peia v.
Bankruptcy Court, Coan, et als
Court of
Appeals Docket No. 02-6138
Court
Below: U.S.D.C. District of Conn.
Docket # 3:00CV2310(PCD)
Dear Madam:
Enclosed herewith for filing is 1 original
and 10 copies of Plaintiff/Appellant’s Request for Permission to Waive
6 Minute Oral
Argument in the form of a
letter/ certification. Please file same.
As a courtesy to the Court, I have provided
three CD-Rom’s for the three Judge panel (I can make more copies if you or they
would like) to facilitate their review of my filings herein. In light of the
“grave reason” requirement for adjournment, the brevity of the time allotted
for argument given this busy Court’s presumed heavy caseload, and the
likelihood that a request for adjournment owing to the lack of funds sufficient
to either travel to the aforementioned Court or the Second Circuit Video
Argument Centers (I have exactly $89.26 before copies hereof, and am on general
relief) would be unfavorably received, I have made the instant request with the
presumption that the same will not militate against me for so doing in light of
the meritorious action involved herein, the clarity of liabi-lity of defendants
as set forth and documented, along with the clear predication for criminal
prosecution of the subject defendants.
I have initiated calls to both the Office of
the U.S. Attorney General Ashcroft (it should be reiterated that former Senator
Ashcroft and now Attorney General Ashcroft had been and is in receipt of
probative documents warranting criminal prosecution of the subject defendants
and liability thereof), and pursuant to their direction, the office of the U.S.
Attorney for the District of Connecticut, who directed me to Ann Nevins, toward
the end of hopefully resolving through financial settlement this very clear
case involving RICO predicate, particularly, and other culpable acts. I have
not received even one returned call (of several to Nevins) from Nevins despite
the fact that criminal prosecution is warranted of defendants within her
district, among others. I am the attorney on this case and I do believe the
same to be a violation of attorney ethics (although to anyone reviewing this
case or from outside the “profession” it is clear that “attorney ethics” are
but a fiction in America today). I am solely interested in the financial
resolution of this case consistent with a meaningful rule of law which should
be an imperative for America (and courts) today given this country’s insistance
upon same from other nations. I have refrained from updating my most current of
websites, viz.,
http://www.albertlouispeia.bravepages.com,
having initiated
said calls and as I discern whether the instant case can be resolved consistent
with a meaningful rule of law and in light of the imminent exposure to “harms
way” of the U.S. troops (quite separate from the bureaucrats) for whom I have
the highest personal regard and back 100%. Finally, it should be noted that the
exhibit to plaintiff’s reply to brief of defendant USA concerning assistant
U.S. Attorney Robert Lester before J.Matz and USA’s default has not yet been
scanned into the web site.
Also, as a further courtesy to the Court, I reiterate that I have under
the hyper-text link, Plaintiff/Appel- lant’s Appeal [scroll down the links
(click to view) frame], set forth the subject filings herein at the following
web sites (I have had to get new web sites owing to hacking and other not
unrelated problems. I continue to include more than one inasmuch as defendant
USA/operatives, “interested parties/defendant”, etc., frequently have “hacked”
same, ie., delete my index html (or other) file(s) on the server, etc.,
requiring my constant attention thereto) to facilitate review thereof; viz.,
http://www.albertlouispeia.bravepages.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.1afm.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.012webpages.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.fcpages.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.150m.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.wtcsites.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.netfirms.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.aokwebhost4free.com;
http://www.albertlouispeia.5u.com;
Thanking you, I am
Very Truly yours,
___________________________________
Albert L. Peia,
Plaintiff/Appellant, Pro Se
P.O. Box 370434
Reseda, CA 91337-0434
(213)219-7649
VIA
CERTIFIED MAIL