Table of Contents                page(s)

PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT’S REPLY

   TO BRIEF OF DEFENDANT USA…………………………………………………………………1 - 10              

 

 Preliminary Statement…………………………………………………………………………………1 – 2

 

 Summary of Reply to Brief of Defendant USA…………………………2 – 4

    As to Counts 3 and 5, Tort and RICO, Respectively

    and the Factual Averments, A-J, Underpinning same……2-4  

 

 

 The Law Apposite in Reply to Brief of Defendant USA……4 - 9

 

 I. The Court Below Erred In According Immunity Under RICO to the Substantial Criminal, Non-governmental Acts of Defendant USA Consistent with the Pattern of Racketeering Activity Set Forth Herein……………………………………………………………………………4-6

 

 II. The Doctrines of Fraudulent Concealment, Equitable Estoppel, Equitable Tolling, and Substantial Criminal Acts of Defendant USA Including Those Violative of RICO to Prevent Detection and Prosecution Thereof, Preclude Defen-dant USA’s Assertion of the Statute of Limitations as a Defense Herein by Doctrine of Res Judicata or Otherwise…6-8

 

 III. Defendant USA is Clearly a RICO Person Within the Meaning of the RICO Statute and As Well, Employees Thereof Are Not Immune From RICO (Civil) Liability for the RICO Crimes and Other Wrongful Conduct Causing Plaintiff Substantial Damages……………………………………………………………………………………………8-9

 

CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10

 

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE…………………………………………………………………………………11

                 ____________________

 

ATTACHMENT TO PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT’S REPLY

   TO BRIEF OF DEFENDANT USA

(numbered consecutively beginning with number 1)……………1 – 44

    Plaintiff’s RICO Statement (filed 6-5-01)………………………1-33

    Court of Appeals Scheduling Order #1………………………………………34

    Defendant USA’s Motion for 30 day Extension of

     Time Until November 15, 2002 To File Its Brief………35-38

    Separate Motion/Order For Extension of Time NOT        

     Served(/received) on Plaintiff/Appellant………………………………40

    Transcript Excerpt Regarding Defendant USA’s

     Default in the Corrupt California Proceeding……………41-44

 

                  Table of Authorities

 

 

STATUTES

 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act  

(“RICO”),18 U.S.C.Sections 1961-1968…………………………………………1 – 9

        18 U.S.C.Section 1965(b)………………………………………………………7

 

 

CASES

Southway v. Central Bank of Nigeria, 198

F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 1999) ……………………………………………………………………4

Sedima,S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co.,Inc.,473 U.S. 479 (1985)…….5

McNeily v. United States, 6 F.3d 343,350

(5th Cir. 1993)……………………………………………………………6

 

Brown v.Nationsbank Corp.,188 F.3d 579,

587(5th Cir.1999……………………………………………………………6

 

Brady v.Dairy Fresh Products,974 F.2d 1149(9thCir1992…………6

 

Denny v. U.S.Postal Service, 916 F.Supp.1081(D.Kan.1996)……6

 

American Nat.Bank & Trust v. City of Chicago,826F2d 1547(7th Cir.1987),cert.den.108 S.Ct. 489,484U.S.977,98 L.Ed.2d487…………………………………………………………………………7

 

Averbach v. Rival Mfg. Co., 809 F.2d 1016,1018 (3rdCir.1987),certiorari denied, 107 S.Ct. 3187,

 482 U.S. 915, 96 L.Ed.2d 675, certiorari denied,

 108 S.Ct. 83, 484 U.S. 822, 98 L.Ed.2d 45)………………………………………9

 

Midwest Grinding Co v. Spitz,976 F.2d 1016(7th Cir.1992)……9