April 26, 2012, 7:50 p.m. ET
Try
this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want
change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a
check.
Several
days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet,
singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for
"betting against
Are
you worried?
Richard
Nixon's "enemies list" appalled the country for the simple reason
that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents
alone represent all Americans. Their powers—to jail, to fine, to bankrupt—are
also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private
citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and
threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the
practice.
Save
Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week,
one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled "Behind the curtain:
A brief history of Romney's donors." In the post, the Obama campaign named
and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having "less-than-reputable
records," the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that
"quite a few" have also been "on the wrong side of the law"
and profiting at "the expense of so many Americans."
These
are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox,
investors who the site outed for the crime of having
"outsourced" jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is
scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon (a
hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a "lobbyist") and Thomas O'Malley
(an energy CEO) stand accused of profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot,
the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a "bitter foe of the gay
rights movement."
These
are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one
holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of
the position or the power of the
Enlarge
Image
Associated Press/The News & Observer
"We
don't tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things,"
says Theodore Olson, the former
The
real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges, is that they have
given money to Mr. Romney. This fundraiser of a president has shown an acute
appreciation for the power of money to win elections, and a cutthroat approach
to intimidating those who might give to his opponents.
He's
targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street—letting it be known that those who
oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He
lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely)
accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll
The
White House has couched its attacks in the language of "disclosure"
and the argument that corporations should not have the same speech rights as
individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation, "he's
doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his
policies." Any giver, at any level, risks reprisal from the president of
the
It's
getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super
PACs are helping the GOP to level the playing field against Democratic
super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr. Romney. The White
House's new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his
donors) as it seeks to frighten others out of giving.
The
Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to
"hold the eventual Republican nominee accountable," but this is a
dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that transcend those
of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that
gives every American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of
government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If Mr. Obama isn't going to
act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn't deserve to be
one.
Write
to [email protected]
A version of this article appeared April 27, 2012, on
page A13 in some