After
The Government Microchips Our Soldiers, How Long Will It Be Before They Want To
Put A Microchip In YOU
http://endoftheamericandream.com
http://albertpeia.com/governmentchippinaway.htm
‘What would you do if someday the government
made it mandatory for everyone to receive an implantable microchip for
identification purposes? Would you take it? Such a scenario may not
be as far off as you might think. In the
The
plan to implant
The
The
military's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, announced plans
to create nanosensors that monitor soldiers' health
on the battlefield and keep doctors constantly abreast about potential health
problems.
These
technological "advances" are usually promoted in such a way that
makes it difficult for the average citizen to get angry about them. After
all, who could be against keeping our soldiers alive and healthy?
But
as they say, the path to hell was paved with good intentions. It turns
out that researches at
Nanotechnology
continues to find a place in the medical field as well. Stanford University
researchers are developing tiny robotic
monitors that can diagnose illnesses, monitor vital stats and even deliver
medicine into the bloodstream, similar to the devices that the military plans
to create. The two projects have yet to link up, but their similar goals
suggest the military could benefit from coordinating efforts with leading
university scientists.
Would
you let them put a microchip inside of you if it would supposedly keep you
healthier?
As
this kind of technology becomes more widespread, people will be told that they
don't want to "miss out" on the great benefits that it provides.
The
spread of implantable microchips is going to mostly be voluntary for right
now. Large numbers of Americans have already taken them, and that number
is going to greatly increase in the years ahead.
A
recent WND article contained some quotes from
privacy expert Katherine Albrecht about how the widespread adoption of
implantable microchips will primarily be through voluntary methods....
“It’s
never going to happen that the government at gunpoint says, ‘You’re going to
have a tracking chip,’” said Katherine Albrecht, who with Liz McIntyre authored
“Spychips,” a book that warns of the threat to
privacy posed by Radio Frequency Identification.
“It’s
always in incremental steps. If you can put a microchip in someone that doesn’t
track them … everybody looks and says, ‘Come on,’” she said. “It’ll be
interesting seeing where we go.”
As
this technology spreads, it will become much easier for various institutions to
start making it a requirement.
For
example, what happens someday if your employer requires you to get an
implantable microchip for security reasons?
What
happens someday if your bank requires you to get an implantable microchip in
order to use your bank account?
Don't
think that it can't happen.
All
over the globe, there is an obsession with making "identity" more
secure.
Just
check out what is going on in
In
The
plan is moving ahead at a clip under the auspices of the National Population
Register (NPR) and the Unique ID (UID) programs, separately governed
initiatives that have an agreement to integrate the data they collect to build
the world’s largest biometric database. Upon enrollment, individuals are issued
12-digit unique ID numbers on chip-based identity cards. For residents who lack
the necessary paperwork to obtain certain kinds of employment or government
services, there’s strong incentive to get a unique ID. While the UID program is
voluntary, enrollment in the NPR program is mandatory for all citizens.
How
long do you think it will be before even more countries develop their own
"Unique ID" programs?
We
will be told that such programs are necessary to prevent identity fraud, to
track criminals and terrorists, to crack down on tax evaders and to strengthen
"national security".
The
thing with a card is that it can always be lost, stolen or forged.
It
seems inevitable that governments around the world will want something even
more "secure" than a card at some point.
So
will you allow the government to inject your "identity card" into
your hand when the time comes?
But
not all of these advanced microchips will be implantable.
As I
have written about previously, some scientists are working on developing "edible microchips". These edible
microchips would be used by doctors to monitor your health. The following
description of these edible microchips comes from a recent article in the Daily Mail....
The
sensor, which contains no battery, antenna or radio, creates a unique digital
signature that is picked up and recorded by a patch attached to the patient's
shoulder.
The
patch, which also monitors bodily functions such as heart rate and temperature,
sends this encrypted information to blue-tooth enabled smartphones
or computers owned by the patient and their doctors and carers.
In
this way, both patients and their doctors can work out exactly which pills have
been taken. Medics can also interpret whether the patient is sleeping well, or
taking enough exercise using the information transmitted from the patch.
Would you take an "edible microchip" if it
would help your doctor take better care of you?
Other
people will want to take implantable microchips because it will enable them to
become more "connected" to our technology grid.
For
example, if it was possible would you connect your brain directly to the
Internet?
It
may not be as far off as you might think. An article on the website of the
Science Channel recently asked the following question....
What
if it were possible to connect your brain to the Internet, either wirelessly or
through a cable, download digital information at high speed, and then translate
it automatically into a chemical form that could be stored by your brain cells
as memory?
That
same article explained that the benefits of directly connecting our brains to the
Internet could be absolutely amazing....
If
you could pump data directly into your gray matter at, say, 50 mbps — the top
speed offered by one major U.S. internet service provider — you’d be able to
read a 500-page book in just under two-tenths of a second.
But
wouldn't connecting your brain to the Internet also be incredibly dangerous?
Couldn't
someone download "viruses" directly into your brain?
Couldn't
someone find a way to "control" your brain remotely?
New
technologies always bring new dangers with them.
We
will be sold on the "benefits" of implantable microchips, but the
public will rarely be told about the potential dangers.
Right
now, there are millions of dogs and cats all over the country that have been
injected with microchips. In fact, some American cities are actually making it mandatory to get your
pets microchipped. We
are told that this makes it much easier to return lost pets to their owners.
All
over
But
what are the dangers?
What
would happen if a totalitarian government started requiring that all citizens
have their "identities" put on a microchip and implanted into them?
It
would certainly make it easier for a "Big Brother" government to watch, monitor and track
everyone.
And
it would become nearly impossible to live a normal life without getting an
implant.
What
would you do if you could not get a bank account without a microchip?
What
would you do if you could not go shopping without a microchip?
What
would you do if you could not get a job without a microchip?
What
would you do if you could not conduct a single financial transaction without a
microchip?
How
would you live?
Certainly
most people would be very tempted to take the microchip so that they could take
care of their families and lead fairly normal lives.
Those
that rebelled and didn't take the microchip would be ostracized and would be
considered enemies of the state. They would be hunted down and hauled off
to prison.
Don't
think that such a scenario is impossible.
Just
think about how our society has changed in recent years. It has become
more like a giant prison every single day.
At
some point in the future, implantable microchip technology will be used for
nefarious purposes.
What
will you do when that day arrives?
