WSWS : News &
Analysis : North
Air Force officer disciplined for saying Bush allowed September 11
Hijacker attended US military school
By Jerry Isaacs
21 June 2002
Use this version to print | Send this link by
email | Email the
A US Air Force officer in California recently accused President Bush of
deliberately allowing the September 11 terror attacks to take place. The
officer has been relieved of his command and faces further discipline. The
controversy surrounding Lt. Col. Steve Butler’s letter to the editor, in
which he affirmed that Bush did nothing to warn the American people
because he “needed this war on terrorism,” received scant coverage in the
Universally ignored by the press, however, was that the officer was not
merely expressing a personal opinion. He was in a position to have direct
knowledge of contacts between the US military and some of the hijackers in
the period before the terrorist attacks that destroyed the World Trade
Center and damaged the Pentagon.
Lieutenant Colonel Butler, who wrote in a letter to the editor of the
Monterey County Herald charging that “Bush knew about the impending
attacks,” was vice chancellor for student affairs at the Defense Language
Institute in Monterey, California—a US military facility that one or more
of the hijackers reportedly attended during the 1990s.
In his May 26 letter to the newspaper, Butler responded to Bush
supporters, who had written the paper opposing the congressional
investigation into the September 11 events. He wrote:
“Of course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America.
He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on
terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama. His presidency was
going nowhere. He wasn’t elected by the American people, but placed in the
Oval Office by a conservative supreme court. The economy was sliding into
the usual Republican pits and he needed something on which to hang his
presidency.... This guy is a joke. What is sleazy and contemptible is the
President of the United States not telling the American people what he
knows for political gain.”
The letter provoked immediate retaliation against the 24-year Air Force
veteran. Butler was transferred from the Monterey installation and
threatened with court martial under Article 88 of the military code, which
prohibits officers from publicly using “contemptuous words” against the
president and other officials.
Last week the Air Force announced it had concluded its investigation of
the case and suggested Butler would likely face “nonjudicial punishment,”
such as a fine or a letter of reprimand, rather than a stiffer sentence.
If he refuses this punishment, however, Butler, who is ready to retire,
could still face a court martial.
The issue is a particularly sensitive one for the Pentagon and the Bush
administration. While many people believe that the Bush administration
viewed September 11 as a priceless opportunity to implement an
ultra-reactionary program of militarism and repression, Butler is
different. His military assignment brought him into contact with at least
one of the alleged hijackers.
Shortly after September 11, several US news outlets reported that Saeed
Alghamdi—named as taking part in the hijacking of United Airlines Flight
93, which crashed in western Pennsylvania—had taken courses at the Defense
Language Institute, the US military’s primary foreign language facility,
where Butler was a leading officer overseeing students (essentially, dean
Alghamdi, a 41-year-old Saudi national, was one of several alleged
hijackers, including accused ringleader Mohamed Atta, who reportedly
trained at US military facilities, according to a series of articles
published between September 15 and 17 in the Washington Post,
Newsweek magazine, the New York Times and several other
On September 15, Newsweek reported: “U.S. military sources have
given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of
the planes used in Tuesday’s terror attacks received training at secure
U.S. military installations in the 1990s.”
The magazine said that Saeed Alghamdi was among three who had taken
flight training at the Navy Air Station in Pensacola, Florida—known as the
“cradle of US Navy aviation”—which also administers training of foreign
aviation students for the Navy. The magazine, citing “a high-ranking
Pentagon official” as its source, reported that two others—both former
Saudi air force pilots who had come to the US—also attended such
facilities. One received tactical training at the Air War College in
Montgomery, Alabama and the other language training at the Lackland Air
Force Base in San Antonio, Texas.
Over the next few days, more detailed information appeared in several
other newspapers. A September 16 article in the New York Times
reported: “Three of the men identified as the hijackers in the attacks on
Tuesday have the same names as alumni of American military schools, the
authorities said today. The men were identified as Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz
al-Omari and Saeed al-Ghamdi.
“The Defense Department said Mr. Atta had gone to the International
Officers School at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama; Mr. al-Omari to the
Aerospace Medical School at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas; and Mr.
al-Ghamdi to the Defense Language Institute at the Presidio in Monterey,
The Knight Ridder news service also reported that Saeed Alghamdi had
been to the Defense Language Institute in Monterey and the Associated
Press cited Air Force sources indicating that more than one of the
hijackers may have received language training at the installation.
The media dropped the story after the Air Force officials issued a
cursory statement aimed at preventing any further inquiry into links
between the US military and the terrorists. While acknowledging that some
of the suspected terrorists “had similar names to foreign alumni of U.S.
military courses,” the statement said discrepancies in biographical
information, such as birth dates and name spellings, “indicate we are
probably not talking about the same people.” Without providing any
substantiation, the statement suggested the hijackers may have stolen the
identities of foreign military personnel who received training at the
Following this less than convincing explanation, the Air Force refused
to release the ages, countries of origin or any other information about
the individuals whose names matched those of the alleged hijackers—making
it virtually impossible to verify the claim that these were not the same
Attorney General John Ashcroft and the FBI also refused to make public
any information. Asked by Florida Senator Bill Nelson whether any of the
hijackers were trained at the Pensacola base, the Justice Department
refused to give a definitive answer, and the FBI said it could not respond
until it could “sort through something complicated and difficult,”
according to the senator’s representative.
To receive such training, the hijackers would have had connections to
Arab governments that enjoyed close relations with the US government. A
former Navy pilot at the Pensacola air station told Newsweek that
during his years on the base, “We always, always, always trained other
countries’ pilots. When I was there two decades ago, it was Iranians. The
Shah was in power. Whoever the country du jour is, that’s whose
pilots we train.”
Military officials acknowledged that the US has a longstanding
agreement with Saudi Arabia to train pilots for the kingdom’s national
guard. Candidates receive air combat training and other courses on several
Army and Navy bases, in a program paid for by Saudi Arabia. Significantly
15 of the 19 hijackers were believed to be Saudi nationals.
According to its web site, the Defense Language Institute Foreign
Language Center in Monterey—founded in 1946 as the Military Intelligence
Service Language School—“provides foreign language services to Department
of Defense, government agencies and foreign governments” to support
“national security interests and global operational needs.”
As vice chancellor for student affairs, Butler had extensive contact
with students, according to Pete Randazzo, a close associate of the
officer and president of the National Association of Government Employees
Local 1690, which represents civilian employees at the language
“He would go and have lunch with the students, sit in their classrooms.
He was a very caring officer over there,” Randazzo told the Herald.
Butler was also navigator of a B-52 bomber during the Persian Gulf War,
which made it likely he was familiar with Saudi military operations, given
the close relations between the US and Saudi Arabia during the 1990-91 war
In the 1990s, several officers were disciplined under Article 88 of the
military code for publicly denouncing Clinton, including an Air Force
general who went so far as to ridicule the president as a “gay-loving,
pot-smoking, draft-dodging womanizer” in front of 250 people at an awards
With Butler’s comments, however, the Pentagon faces a more delicate
problem. The Lieutenant Colonel may well know considerably more than he is
saying about US military-intelligence apparatus involvement in the
September 11 events, and, on the eve of his retirement, took the
opportunity to set the record straight.
11 cover-up crumbles: Who was covering for Moussaoui, and why?
and conspiracy: The Bush administration and September 11
Was the US
government alerted to September 11 attack?
[16 January 2002]
Top of page
Readers: The WSWS invites your
comments. Please send
World Socialist Web Site